US20090286615A1 - Golf club with optimum moments of inertia in the vertical and hosel axes - Google Patents

Golf club with optimum moments of inertia in the vertical and hosel axes Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20090286615A1
US20090286615A1 US12/508,752 US50875209A US2009286615A1 US 20090286615 A1 US20090286615 A1 US 20090286615A1 US 50875209 A US50875209 A US 50875209A US 2009286615 A1 US2009286615 A1 US 2009286615A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
axis
moi
club head
golf club
hosel
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
US12/508,752
Other versions
US8267808B2 (en
Inventor
Noah De La Cruz
Charles E. Golden
John Morin
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Acushnet Co
Original Assignee
Individual
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority claimed from US11/552,729 external-priority patent/US7497789B2/en
Priority claimed from US12/339,326 external-priority patent/US8025591B2/en
Priority to US12/508,752 priority Critical patent/US8267808B2/en
Application filed by Individual filed Critical Individual
Assigned to ACUSHNET COMPANY reassignment ACUSHNET COMPANY ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: DE LA CRUZ, NOAH, MORIN, JOHN, GOLDEN, CHARLES E.
Publication of US20090286615A1 publication Critical patent/US20090286615A1/en
Priority to US13/238,678 priority patent/US8333668B2/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US8267808B2 publication Critical patent/US8267808B2/en
Priority to US13/714,160 priority patent/US8636608B2/en
Priority to US14/152,242 priority patent/US9302161B2/en
Assigned to WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT reassignment WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT SECURITY INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: ACUSHNET COMPANY
Assigned to JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS SUCCESSOR ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT reassignment JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS SUCCESSOR ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT ASSIGNMENT OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS (ASSIGNS 039506-0030) Assignors: WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS RESIGNING ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT
Assigned to JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT reassignment JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT SECURITY INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: ACUSHNET COMPANY
Active legal-status Critical Current
Adjusted expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A63SPORTS; GAMES; AMUSEMENTS
    • A63BAPPARATUS FOR PHYSICAL TRAINING, GYMNASTICS, SWIMMING, CLIMBING, OR FENCING; BALL GAMES; TRAINING EQUIPMENT
    • A63B60/00Details or accessories of golf clubs, bats, rackets or the like
    • A63B60/02Ballast means for adjusting the centre of mass
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A63SPORTS; GAMES; AMUSEMENTS
    • A63BAPPARATUS FOR PHYSICAL TRAINING, GYMNASTICS, SWIMMING, CLIMBING, OR FENCING; BALL GAMES; TRAINING EQUIPMENT
    • A63B53/00Golf clubs
    • A63B53/04Heads
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A63SPORTS; GAMES; AMUSEMENTS
    • A63BAPPARATUS FOR PHYSICAL TRAINING, GYMNASTICS, SWIMMING, CLIMBING, OR FENCING; BALL GAMES; TRAINING EQUIPMENT
    • A63B53/00Golf clubs
    • A63B53/04Heads
    • A63B53/0408Heads characterised by specific dimensions, e.g. thickness
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A63SPORTS; GAMES; AMUSEMENTS
    • A63BAPPARATUS FOR PHYSICAL TRAINING, GYMNASTICS, SWIMMING, CLIMBING, OR FENCING; BALL GAMES; TRAINING EQUIPMENT
    • A63B53/00Golf clubs
    • A63B53/04Heads
    • A63B53/0437Heads with special crown configurations
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A63SPORTS; GAMES; AMUSEMENTS
    • A63BAPPARATUS FOR PHYSICAL TRAINING, GYMNASTICS, SWIMMING, CLIMBING, OR FENCING; BALL GAMES; TRAINING EQUIPMENT
    • A63B53/00Golf clubs
    • A63B53/04Heads
    • A63B53/0441Heads with visual indicators for aligning the golf club
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A63SPORTS; GAMES; AMUSEMENTS
    • A63BAPPARATUS FOR PHYSICAL TRAINING, GYMNASTICS, SWIMMING, CLIMBING, OR FENCING; BALL GAMES; TRAINING EQUIPMENT
    • A63B53/00Golf clubs
    • A63B53/04Heads
    • A63B53/045Strengthening ribs
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A63SPORTS; GAMES; AMUSEMENTS
    • A63BAPPARATUS FOR PHYSICAL TRAINING, GYMNASTICS, SWIMMING, CLIMBING, OR FENCING; BALL GAMES; TRAINING EQUIPMENT
    • A63B53/00Golf clubs
    • A63B53/04Heads
    • A63B53/0466Heads wood-type
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A63SPORTS; GAMES; AMUSEMENTS
    • A63BAPPARATUS FOR PHYSICAL TRAINING, GYMNASTICS, SWIMMING, CLIMBING, OR FENCING; BALL GAMES; TRAINING EQUIPMENT
    • A63B60/00Details or accessories of golf clubs, bats, rackets or the like
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A63SPORTS; GAMES; AMUSEMENTS
    • A63BAPPARATUS FOR PHYSICAL TRAINING, GYMNASTICS, SWIMMING, CLIMBING, OR FENCING; BALL GAMES; TRAINING EQUIPMENT
    • A63B53/00Golf clubs
    • A63B53/04Heads
    • A63B2053/0491Heads with added weights, e.g. changeable, replaceable
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A63SPORTS; GAMES; AMUSEMENTS
    • A63BAPPARATUS FOR PHYSICAL TRAINING, GYMNASTICS, SWIMMING, CLIMBING, OR FENCING; BALL GAMES; TRAINING EQUIPMENT
    • A63B2209/00Characteristics of used materials
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A63SPORTS; GAMES; AMUSEMENTS
    • A63BAPPARATUS FOR PHYSICAL TRAINING, GYMNASTICS, SWIMMING, CLIMBING, OR FENCING; BALL GAMES; TRAINING EQUIPMENT
    • A63B2209/00Characteristics of used materials
    • A63B2209/02Characteristics of used materials with reinforcing fibres, e.g. carbon, polyamide fibres
    • A63B2209/023Long, oriented fibres, e.g. wound filaments, woven fabrics, mats
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A63SPORTS; GAMES; AMUSEMENTS
    • A63BAPPARATUS FOR PHYSICAL TRAINING, GYMNASTICS, SWIMMING, CLIMBING, OR FENCING; BALL GAMES; TRAINING EQUIPMENT
    • A63B53/00Golf clubs
    • A63B53/04Heads
    • A63B53/0408Heads characterised by specific dimensions, e.g. thickness
    • A63B53/0412Volume
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A63SPORTS; GAMES; AMUSEMENTS
    • A63BAPPARATUS FOR PHYSICAL TRAINING, GYMNASTICS, SWIMMING, CLIMBING, OR FENCING; BALL GAMES; TRAINING EQUIPMENT
    • A63B53/00Golf clubs
    • A63B53/04Heads
    • A63B53/0433Heads with special sole configurations

Definitions

  • the invention relates to golf clubs, and more particularly, to metal wood and utility-type golf clubs having improved mass characteristics.
  • the complexities of golf club design are known.
  • the specifications for each component of the club i.e., the club head, shaft, grip, and subcomponents thereof
  • directly impact the performance of the club i.e., the club head, shaft, grip, and subcomponents thereof.
  • a golf club can be tailored to have specific performance characteristics.
  • club heads has long been studied. Among the more prominent considerations in club head design are loft, lie, face angle, horizontal face bulge, vertical face roll, center of gravity location, rotational moment of inertia, material selection, and overall head weight. While this basic set of criteria is generally the focus of golf club designers, several other design aspects must also be addressed.
  • the interior design of the club head may be tailored to achieve particular characteristics, such as the inclusion of a hosel or a shaft attachment means, perimeter weights on the club head, and fillers within the hollow club heads.
  • Golf club heads must also be strong to withstand the stresses that occur during repeated collisions between the golf club and the golf balls. The loading that occurs during this transient event can create a peak force of over 2,000 lbs. Thus, a major challenge is to design the club face and club body to resist permanent deformation or fracture. Conventional hollow metal wood drivers made from titanium typically have a uniform face thickness exceeding 2.5 mm or 0.10 inch to ensure structural integrity of the club head.
  • Players generally seek a metal wood driver and golf ball combination that delivers maximum distance and landing accuracy.
  • the distance a ball travels after impact is dictated by the magnitude and direction of the ball's initial velocity and the ball's rotational velocity or spin.
  • Environmental conditions including atmospheric pressure, humidity, temperature, and wind speed, further influence the ball's flight. However, these environmental effects are beyond the control of the golf equipment designers.
  • Golf ball landing accuracy is driven by a number of factors as well. Some of these factors are attributed to club head design, such as center of gravity and moment of inertia.
  • the current trend in golf club manufacturing is to produce large volume club heads in order to maximize the moment of inertia of the club head.
  • USGA United States Golf Association
  • the governing body for the rules of golf in the United States has specifications for the performance of golf equipment. These performance specifications dictate the size and weight of a conforming golf ball or a conforming golf club.
  • USGA rules limit a number of parameters for drivers. For example, the volume of drivers has been limited to 460 ⁇ 10 cubic centimeters. The length of the shaft, except for putters, has been capped at 48 inches. The driver club heads must fit inside a 5-inch square and the height from the sole to the crown cannot exceed 2.8 inches.
  • the USGA has further limited the coefficient of restitution of the impact between a driver and a golf ball to 0.830.
  • the USGA has also observed that the rotational moment of inertia of drivers, or the club's resistance to twisting on off-center hits, has tripled from about 1990 to 2005, which coincides with the introduction of oversize drivers. Since drivers with higher rotational moment of inertia are more forgiving on off-center hits, the USGA was concerned that further increases in the club head's inertia may reduce the challenge of the game, and instituted in 2006 a limit on the moment of inertia for drivers at 5900 g ⁇ cm ⁇ 100 g ⁇ cm 2 (590 kg ⁇ mm 2 ⁇ 10 kg ⁇ mm 2 ) or 32.259 oz ⁇ in 2 ⁇ 0.547 oz ⁇ in 2 .
  • the USGA limits moment of inertia for drivers, as the calculated moment of inertia with respect to a vertical axis through the center of gravity of the club head. Larger MOIs about the vertical axis preserve more ball speed on off-center impacts. However, when a golf club head approaches a golf ball during the downswing the golf club head rotates around the shaft or hosel of the club. The moment of inertia around this “hosel axis” tends to be significantly larger than the moment of inertia around the vertical axis through the center of gravity.
  • the moment of inertia about the hosel or shaft axis is the rotational mass or “foot print” of the club that the golfer must work to overcome just prior to impact in order to hit a straight shot.
  • this difference in moment of inertia is even more exaggerated.
  • Players may find it difficult to control a club head having a very large moment of inertia around the hosel axis, because it requires more work during the downswing to “square” the face and hit straight shots.
  • the '326 parent patent application teaches methods for optimizing the mass properties of golf club heads, having a smaller volume or smaller footprint, an optimized moment of inertia with respect to the hosel axis and/or an optimized rotational mass footprint.
  • This parent patent application also teaches golf club heads having a large moment of inertia around the vertical axis through the center of gravity relative to a moment of inertia around the hosel axis.
  • One embodiment of the present invention is directed to a hollow body golf club head having an outer shell and an inner frame.
  • the outer shell comprises one or more lightweight members, preferably on the crown, the skirt or the sole.
  • these lightweight members are made from low density metals, metal-polymer composites, reinforced plastics and plastics, among others.
  • the inner frame is disposed within the outer shell and is preferably connected to the sole and the hitting face.
  • the inner frame preferably fits within a 4 inches ⁇ 4 inches ⁇ 2.8 inches envelope and may carry discrete weights or masses.
  • weights or masses are located away from the center of gravity or the geometric center of the club head to optimize the moment of inertia (MOI) of the club head about both the vertical axis running through the center of gravity or geometric center of the club head, hereinafter referred to as the “y-axis,” and the axis running through the center of the shaft of the golf club, hereinafter referred to as the “hosel axis.”
  • the weights or masses can be distributed throughout the inner frame.
  • the hollow golf club head comprises an outer shell and a hitting face.
  • the hitting face and a portion of the skirt proximate the toe form a curved blade in the shape of a sickle or battle ax and an inner support bridges the toe end of the curved blade to the hosel for structural support.
  • a golf club head of the present invention preferably has a MOI about the y-axis between about 470 kg ⁇ mm 2 and about 600 kg ⁇ mm 2 and MOI about the hosel axis between about 600 kg ⁇ mm 2 and about 725 kg ⁇ mm 2 .
  • the ratio of MOI (y-axis) to MOI (hosel axis) is preferably greater than about 0.55. More preferably, this ratio is greater than about 0.75. In certain embodiments, this ratio is greater than about 1.00, which means that advantageously MOI (hosel axis) can be lower than MOI (y-axis).
  • FIG. 1 is a graph showing the preferred ranges of moment of inertia about a y-axis and about a hosel axis for golf club heads of the present invention
  • FIGS. 2 , 4 , 6 , 8 and 10 are bottom plan views of idealized golf club heads of the present invention.
  • FIGS. 3 , 5 , 7 , 9 and 11 are bottom plan views of golf club heads according to the present invention.
  • FIG. 12A is a top perspective view of a multi-material driver club of the present invention
  • FIG. 12B is similar to FIG. 12A with portions removed for better clarity
  • FIG. 12C is the bottom perspective view of the club head of FIG. 12A
  • FIG. 12D is the bottom perspective view of the club head of FIG. 12B ;
  • FIG. 13 is a top plan view of a golf club head of the present invention.
  • FIG. 14 is a cross-sectional view of a golf club head of the present invention.
  • FIG. 15 is a top view of another embodiment of the present invention showing a club head with an outer shell and an inner frame
  • FIG. 16 is a side view of the embodiment of FIG. 15 ;
  • FIG. 17 is a top cut-away view of another embodiment of the present invention showing a club head having a curved blade hitting face;
  • FIG. 18 is a top view of a club head showing a lightweight member.
  • Rotational moment of inertia (“MOI” or “inertia”) in golf clubs is well known in the art, and is fully discussed in a number of references, including U.S. Pat. No. 4,420,156, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
  • MOI Rotational moment of inertia
  • inertia When the inertia is too low, the club head tends to rotate excessively from off-center hits.
  • a golf club head having a higher moment of inertia will resist rotation due to an off-center impact between the club face and a golf ball, thereby reducing loss of ball speed, mitigating the tendency for the ball to hook or slice and increasing flight distance and subsequently landing accuracy.
  • the present invention is directed to a hollow body golf club head having a hosel, face, crown, skirt and sole, wherein the club head further comprises discrete concentrations of weight or mass located away from the center of gravity or the geometric center of the club head to optimize the moment of inertia (MOI) of the club head about both the vertical axis running through the center of gravity or geometric center of the club head, hereinafter referred to as the “y-axis,” and the axis running through the center of the shaft of the golf club, hereinafter referred to as the “hosel axis.”
  • the present invention is directed to a metal-wood or utility golf club head having the above-described mass characteristics.
  • the golf club head of the present invention preferably has a volume between about 390 cc and about 420 cc.
  • the inventor of the present invention has determined that the MOI (y-axis) is preferably between about 450 kg ⁇ mm 2 to about 600 kg ⁇ mm 2 and more preferably between about 470 kg ⁇ mm 2 and about 600 kg ⁇ mm 2 .
  • the MOI (y-axis) can further be between about 545 kg ⁇ mm 2 and about 600 kg ⁇ mm 2 .
  • the MOI (hosel axis) is preferably between about 600 kg ⁇ mm 2 and 800 kg ⁇ mm 2 and more preferably between about 600 kg ⁇ mm 2 and about 725 kg ⁇ mm 2 .
  • Lower rotational footprint in accordance to the present invention can be achieved for club head having volumes up to and beyond about 460 cc, when the club head is made from multiple materials, including one or more plastics or when discretionary weight usable to affect changes in mass characteristics are moved inward spaced from the perimeter of the club head, as discussed below.
  • the ratio of the MOI (y-axis) to the MOI (hosel axis) is preferably greater than about 0.55, but is more preferably greater than about 0.75. As shown below, this ratio can be greater than 1.00, which indicates that MOI (hosel axis) can be made lower than MOI (y-axis). This is another preferred embodiment of the present invention, because it preserves the desirable high MOI (y-axis) while minimizing the rotational foot print or MOI (hosel axis).
  • Another way to control the MOI is to couple the MOI (y-axis) to the volume of the club head, since lowering the volume of the club head is one way of lowering the MOI (hosel axis).
  • the volume of the club head is greater than 350 cc, but is more preferably between about 390 cc and about 420 cc.
  • the ratio of the MOI (y-axis) to the volume of the club head is preferably greater than about 1.30 kg ⁇ mm 2 /cm 3 for a club head having a volume of about 350 cc or greater.
  • the ratio of the MOI (y-axis) to the volume of the club head is more preferably greater than about 1.45 kg ⁇ mm 2 /cm 3 and more preferably greater than about 1.50 kg ⁇ mm 2 /cm 3 for club heads with volume of about 350 cc or greater. Preferably, this ratio is less than about 1.70 kg ⁇ mm 2 /cm 3 .
  • Yet another way to control the MOI is to limit the distance of the center of gravity to be from about 2 ⁇ 3 inch to about 1 inch measured orthogonally from hitting face.
  • the center of gravity can be located more than about 1 inch from the hitting face to provide a larger sweet spot on the hitting face.
  • the volume of the club and the MOI (hosel axis) of the club By limiting how far back the center of gravity can be located, i.e., from about 2 ⁇ 3 inch to about 1 inch from the hitting face, one can control the volume of the club and the MOI (hosel axis) of the club, while allowing the MOI (y-axis) to be between 450 kg ⁇ mm 2 and about 650 kg ⁇ mm 2 , more preferably between 500 kg ⁇ mm 2 and 600 kg ⁇ mm 2 .
  • the driver club of the present invention possesses substantially similar MOI properties of the larger 460 cc driver club but with smaller volume, and is easier for golfers to control during the downswing.
  • the weight can be distributed around the club head in an inventive manner to achieve the desirable MOI (y-axis) to MOI (hosel axis) ratio and/or the desirable MOI (y-axis) to club head volume factor.
  • moment of inertia I can be calculated using the following equation:
  • m is the mass of the object and r is the distance of that mass from the axis of rotation.
  • MOI When MOI must be calculated about an axis of rotation going through a point other than the center of mass, one can determine MOI using the parallel axis theorem.
  • the MOI of such an object can be calculated using the equation
  • the golf club head of the present invention may utilize a number of mass distribution patterns, including those shown in FIGS. 2 , 4 , 6 , 8 and 10 , to optimize MOI (y-axis) and the MOI (hosel axis).
  • the mass characteristics of each idealized club head are summarized in Table 1.
  • the idealized club heads of FIGS. 2 , 4 , 6 , 8 and 10 fit into the prescribed USGA-prescribed 5-inch square and have a mass of 200 grams.
  • 200 grams of mass were divided into two portions of the club head, portion A and portion B. In one iteration, portion A contains two-thirds, or 133 grams, of the mass of the club head, while portion B contains one-third, or 67 grams, of the mass of the club head.
  • portion A contains three-fourths, or 150 grams, of the mass of the club head, while portion B contains one-fourth, or 50 grams, of the mass of the club head.
  • the y-axis runs through the geometric center of the club head.
  • mass portions A and B are located adjacent to the perimeter of the 5 inch by 5 inch envelope prescribed by the USGA.
  • Table 1 shows MOI values about both a y-axis running through the geometric center and the hosel axis of an idealized golf club head.
  • the hosel axis of the club heads shown in FIGS. 2 , 4 , 6 , 8 and 10 runs through point C.
  • point C is located 4 inches from toe edge 18 and 0.5 inches from face edge 20 .
  • point C is located 4.5 inches from toe edge 18 and 0.5 inches from face edge 20 .
  • Table 1 provides the ratio of the MOI (y-axis) to the MOI (hosel axis) for each iteration of mass distribution, as well as the ratio of MOI (y-axis) to volume for each iteration of mass distribution
  • MOI MOI M (club head) m (A) m (B) (y-axis) (hosel axis) MOI (y-axis)/ MOI (y-axis)/volume [g] [g] [g] [kg ⁇ mm 2 ] [kg ⁇ mm 2 ] MOI (hosel axis) 390 cc 420 cc 460 cc FIG. 2 200 133 67 793.69 1097.62 0.72 2.04 1.89 1.73 200 150 50 793.69 847.36 0.94 2.04 1.89 1.73 FIG.
  • FIG. 6 200 133 67 879.50 597.06 1.47 2.26 2.09 1.91 200 150 50 858.05 471.94 1.82 2.20 2.04 1.87
  • FIG. 8 200 133 67 836.60 1026.12 0.82 2.15 1.99 1.82 200 150 50 825.88 793.73 1.04 2.12 1.97 1.80
  • a club head fitting snugly inside a 5-inch square having a mass of 200 grams and mass distributions as depicted in FIGS. 2 , 4 , 6 , 8 and 10 meet the preferred ratio of MOI (y-axis) to MOI (hosel axis).
  • the calculated MOI (y-axis) values are higher than the 590 kg ⁇ mm 2 USGA limit for the idealized shapes, it is expected that for commercial club head, see e.g., FIGS.
  • the MOI (y-axis) would be within the USGA limit due to the smaller footprints of the commercial club heads.
  • Another way to reduce the MOI (y-axis) is to reduce the mass of areas “B” in FIGS. 2 , 4 , 6 , 8 and 10 .
  • mass areas “B” is moved toward mass area “A” such that the club head fits snugly inside a 4-inch by 4-inch envelope.
  • Point “C” would be located 3 inches from toe edge 18 and 0.5 inch from face edge 20 for FIGS. 2 , 4 , 6 and 8 , and be located 3.5 inches from toe edge 18 and 0.5 inch from face edge 20 for FIG. 10 .
  • Table 2 provides the ratio of MOI (y-axis) to MOI (hosel axis) and the ratio of MOI (y-axis) to volume for this configuration.
  • MOI MOI M (club head) m (A) m (B) (y-axis) (hosel axis) MOI (y-axis)/ MOI (y-axis)/volume [g] [g] [g] [kg ⁇ mm 2 ] [kg ⁇ mm 2 ] MOI (hosel axis) 390 cc 420 cc 460 cc FIG. 2 200 133 67 430.00 665.00 0.55 1.10 1.02 0.93 200 150 50 430.74 523.45 0.82 1.10 1.03 0.94 FIG. 4 200 133 67 487.61 730.57 0.67 1.25 1.16 1.06 200 150 50 473.97 572.37 0.83 1.22 1.13 1.03 FIG.
  • FIG. 8 200 133 67 487.61 341.63 1.43 1.25 1.16 1.06 200 150 50 473.97 280.00 1.69 1.22 1.13 1.03
  • FIG. 8 200 133 67 476.80 622.53 0.77 1.22 1.14 1.04 200 150 50 465.86 491.35 0.95 1.19 1.11 1.01
  • MOI (y-axis) values for a 4-inch by 4-inch envelope are all under the USGA limit of 590 kg ⁇ mm 2 .
  • This design envelope can be enlarged to about 4.5-inch by 4.5-inch design envelope without exceeding the USGA limit.
  • the ratio of MOI (y-axis) to MOI (hosel axis) is greater than about 0.55, preferably greater than about 0.75.
  • the embodiment of FIG. 6 shows that the MOI (hosel axis) can be designed to be lower than the MOI (y-axis), i.e., the rotational foot print can be reduced while maintaining a high MOI (y-axis) to limit the adverse effects of off-centered hits.
  • the ratio of MOI (y-axis) to MOI (hosel axis) is greater than about 1.00.
  • the ratio of MOI (y-axis) to club head volume for this embodiment is from about 0.90 kg ⁇ mm 2 /cm 3 to about 1.30 kg ⁇ mm 2 /cm 3 .
  • This ratio is preferably greater than about 0.90 kg ⁇ mm 2 /cm 3 , more preferably greater than 1.00 and more preferably greater than about 1.10.
  • this ratio can be greater than about 1.20, preferably greater than about 1.40 and more preferably greater than about 1.60. This ratio should be less than about 1.70 kg ⁇ mm 2 /cm 3 .
  • MOI hosel axis
  • MOI hosel axis
  • MOI hosel axis
  • MOI hosel axis
  • MOI y-axis
  • any of the ratios discussed herewithin to be customized for any individual player after proper fittings.
  • FIGS. 3 , 5 , 7 , 9 and 11 show driver-style club head 10 having concentrated areas of mass 12 allocated on the sole in patterns similar to those of the idealized club heads of FIGS. 2 , 4 , 6 , 8 and 10 , respectively.
  • a club head of the present invention may have a pattern of mass distribution on the sole of the club head as shown in FIGS. 3 , 5 , 7 , 9 and 11 . Concentrated areas of mass 12 are located on the sole of golf club 10 to cause the center of gravity of the club to remain relatively low.
  • mass may be allocated on the sole of the club head in regions around the base of the hosel, as shown in FIGS. 3 , 5 , 7 and 9 .
  • the sole may include other concentrated areas of mass, such as toward the back and toe as in FIGS. 3 and 5 .
  • other areas of mass may be located toward the face and toe as in FIG. 7 , or toward the back as in FIG. 9 .
  • a “pseudo I-beam” pattern of mass distribution wherein mass is concentrated toward the face edge and toward the back, as in FIG. 11 may also be utilized.
  • Areas of concentrated mass such as portions A and B of the club heads of FIGS. 2 , 4 , 6 , 8 and 10 ; areas 12 of the golf club heads of FIGS. 3 , 5 , 7 , 9 and 11 ; and other discrete portions of mass in the golf club heads may comprises high density metals such as stainless steel, tungsten or iron. These areas may also comprise high density polymer composite.
  • the material surrounding these concentrated areas of mass preferably comprises a less dense material, for instance metals such as aluminum, stainless steel, magnesium or titanium, or a polymer composite with high density fillers such as tungsten powder.
  • areas of concentrated mass may comprise the same material as that surrounding the area of concentrated mass, however having a greater thickness than the surrounding material.
  • club head 10 comprises multiple materials with a section of the club head comprises the lightest material of the club head.
  • the parent application discloses a wood-type club head with weights from the crown, sole and skirt moved aft or to the perimeter to maximize the MOI of the club head.
  • the mid-section of said club head is made from a lightweight material, such as carbon fiber composites, thermoplastic or thermoset polymers or lightweight metals. It had been shown in the parent application that a 460 cc/200 g club head made from titanium hitting cup, titanium aft cup and carbon fiber tube mid-section can achieve significantly better c.g. position and MOI properties than the same club made out of titanium alone.
  • All of the multi-material club heads disclosed in the parent case can be used in the current invention, preferably with the volume reduced to about 390 cc-420 cc, to achieve the preferred MOI (y-axis)/MOI (shaft axis) and MOI (y-axis)/volume ratios, described above.
  • FIG. 12A shows club head 30 made from three different materials.
  • Club head 30 comprises hitting cup 32 , which includes the hitting face, frame section 34 , which includes crown and sole bridges/connectors and crown and sole plates 36 .
  • Hitting cup 32 is made from the material with the highest specific gravity, such as titanium, stainless steel, magnesium.
  • Frame 34 is made from a material that is lighter than the material of hitting cup 32 but heavier than the material of the crown and sole plates 36 .
  • frame 34 is sufficiently sturdy to provide support for the crown and sole plates 36 , and to retain the shape of club head 30 .
  • Frame 34 can be made out of aluminum, magnesium, or reinforced or unreinforced plastic/polymer.
  • Crown and sole plates 36 are made from the lightest material in club head 30 , such as aluminum or reinforced or unreinforced plastic/polymer to allow more weight to be deployed near the hitting face and the back of the club head to achieve the preferred MOI (y-axis)/MOI (shaft axis) and MOI (y-axis)/volume ratios.
  • FIGS. 12B and 12D shows club head 30 without the crown and sole plates to more clearly show hitting cup 32 and frame 34 .
  • FIG. 12C shows the bottom view of club head 30 to illustrate more clearly sole plates 36 .
  • Suitable plastics/polymers for use in club head 30 include polyetheretherketone (PEEK) commercially available as TecapeekTM from Ensinger, Inc. from Washington, Pa.
  • PEEK polyetheretherketone
  • TecapeekTM TecapeekTM from Ensinger, Inc. from Washington, Pa.
  • a 30% glass or carbon reinforced PEEK which has increased tensile strength, is used to increase the mechanical strength of the plastic. Relevant properties of some of the preferred materials are summarized below.
  • Exemplary multi-material club heads 30 having a volume of 410 cc made from various preferred materials are illustrated below.
  • golf club head 10 comprises an exterior surface having a horizontal bulge radius, defined as a radius of curvature R b , extending from heel 22 to toe 24 and measured along the horizontal midline between the top and bottom of face 30 .
  • Golf club head 10 further comprises a vertical roll radius, shown in FIG. 14 and defined as a radius of curvature R r , extending from top 26 to bottom 28 of face 30 and measured along the vertical midline between the toe and heel edges of face 30 .
  • a golf club head of the present invention having a MOI about the y-axis equal to or greater than about 450 kg ⁇ mm 2 and less than about 500 kg ⁇ mm 2 preferably has a horizontal bulge radius of about 12 inches and a vertical roll radius of about 10 inches.
  • a golf club head having a MOI about the y-axis equal to or greater than about 500 kg ⁇ mm 2 and less than about 550 kg ⁇ mm 2 preferably has a horizontal bulge radius of about 13 inches and a vertical roll radius of about 10 inches.
  • a golf club head having a MOI about the y-axis equal to or greater than about 550 kg ⁇ mm 2 preferably has a horizontal bulge radius of about 14 inches and a vertical face roll radius of about 10 inches.
  • Club head 50 preferably is a full-sized club head, i.e., has a volume from about 420 cc to about 460 cc and preferably about 460 cc.
  • Club head 50 comprises hitting face 52 , outer shell 54 and inner frame 56 .
  • outer shell 54 fits within an envelope of 5 inches ⁇ 5 inches ⁇ 2.8 inches prescribed by the USGA
  • inner frame 56 fits within a smaller envelope of 4 inches ⁇ 4 inches ⁇ 2.8 inches.
  • the smaller envelope as discussed above and in the '326 parent patent application can provide club heads optimized MOIs in the vertical and hosel axes.
  • outer shell 54 is made from strong lightweight materials, such as metal plastic composites, carbon fiber composites, aluminum, reinforced or unreinforced plastics, e.g., PEEK, carbon fiber/glass fiber reinforced PEEK, ABS, ABS(CF), PEI, PEI(CF), Nylon 66 (CF) or PP, described above.
  • Lightweight materials can be used as part of the crown, skirt and the sole.
  • the sole is reinforced as described below to withstand impacts with the ground during play. Discretionary weights available from using lightweight materials are distributed throughout inner frame 56 or are attached as discrete weight(s) A and/or B to inner frame 56 .
  • Discrete weights A and B can be attached in similar manners shown in FIGS. 2-11 , except that these weights are attached to inner frame 56 instead of to the sole, hitting face or back as shown. Since the sole has to withstand multiple impacts with the ground during play, the sole especially when made from lightweight material is supported by inner frame 56 . As best shown in FIG. 16 , inner frame 56 is disposed on sole 58 to advantageously provide structural support to the sole. Inner frame 56 is preferably made from strong, resilient materials such as metals, e.g., stainless steel, aluminum, titanium. Metals with high specific gravity are preferred when the discretionary weights are distributed throughout inner frame 56 . Metals with lower specific gravity are preferred when the discretionary weights are discrete weights A and B attached to inner frame 56 . In a preferred embodiment, not including the hitting face the weight of inner frame 56 is higher than the weight of outer shell 54 .
  • club head 50 which is preferably a full-sized club head having a volume up to 460 cc can have optimized MOIs in the vertical and hosel axes of a club head with a smaller foot print, described above and in the '326 parent application.
  • inner frame 56 is substantially centered with respect to hitting face 52 in the toe-heel direction. Due to this relative positioning, sweet spot 60 is located at substantially the same distance from hosel 62 in inventive club head 50 as in conventional 460 cc club head, as best illustrated by outer shell 54 .
  • the advantage of having sweet spot 60 substantially in the same location as the sweet spot in conventional full-sized club head is that the learning curve for golfers switching from conventional full-sized club head to inventive club head 50 to take advantage of optimized MOIs is minimal, because the golfers can address the balls the same way and drive the balls with the same swing.
  • inventive club head 50 has the same appearance as a full-sized club head.
  • the MOIs in the vertical and hosel axes and MOI ratios for club head 50 with inner frame 56 are preferably similar to those listed in Table 2.
  • Club head 70 comprises hitting cup 72 , which includes hitting face 74 and wing 76 , which is formed from a portion of the skirt proximate to the toe of the club head. Hitting face 74 and wing 76 visually have the form of a curved blade, a sickle or battle ax. Club head 70 further comprises inner bridge 78 that connects hosel 62 to wing 76 . Inner bridge 78 assists hitting cup 72 resisting deformation caused by a moment about hosel 62 from impacts with golf balls.
  • inner bridge 78 can be a shock absorber to decrease the vibration of wing 76 caused by impacts with golf balls.
  • inner bridge 78 may comprise multiple telescopic members supported by helical or leaf spring disposed therewithin to absorb vibration.
  • inner bridge 78 can be a leaf spring.
  • inner bridge 78 can be curved and has a concave shape relative to hitting face 74 to resist bending of wing 76 .
  • Discrete weight A can be added near hosel 62 and discrete weight B can be added at wing 76 , similar to the embodiments shown in FIGS. 6 and 7 to optimize MOIs about the vertical and hosel axes.
  • club head 70 fits within a 4 inches ⁇ 4 inches ⁇ 2.8 inches envelope or a 4.5 inches ⁇ 4.5 inches ⁇ 2.8 inches envelope, and the MOIs in the vertical and hosel axes and MOI ratios for club head 70 are preferably similar to those listed in Table 2.
  • Club head 70 further comprises outer shell 78 of lightweight materials discussed above.
  • FIG. 18 illustrates an exemplary embodiment or appearance of club head 10 , 30 , 50 , 70 using lightweight materials.
  • Club head 10 , 30 , 50 , 70 has lightweight crown 82 , which comprises relatively rigid ribs 84 preferably made out of metal or reinforced plastics and inserts 86 made from low specific gravity plastics. Ribs 84 provide structural supports for crown 82 and inserts 86 provide weight savings that can contribute to the discretionary weights A and B.
  • crown 82 comprises an inner crown made from lightweight material and an outer crown 84 with holes 86 punched therefrom.

Abstract

A hollow golf club is provided having an outer shell and an inner frame. The outer shell comprises one or more lightweight members, such as the crown or the skirt, and preferably fits within an envelope of about 5 inches×5 inches×2.8 inches. The inner frame fits within a smaller envelope and sits on the sole of the club head. One or more weights are located either on or within the inner frame to optimize the moment of inertia of the club head about both the vertical axis running through the center of gravity or geometric center of the club head, hereinafter referred to as the “y-axis,” and the axis running through the center of the shaft of the golf club, hereinafter referred to as the “hosel axis.” The weights can be attached to the inner frame or can be distributed within the inner frame. In another embodiment, the hitting face and a portion of the skirt proximate the toe form a curved blade in the shape of a sickle or battle ax and an inner support bridges the toe end of the curved blade to the hosel for structural support. The ratio of moment of inertia of the club head about the y-axis to moment of inertia of the club head about the hosel axis is preferably 0.55. More preferably, this ratio is 0.75.

Description

    CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
  • This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 12/339,326 filed on Dec. 19, 2008, which is a continuation-in-part of co-pending U.S. application Ser. No. 11/552,729, filed on Oct. 25, 2006, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,497,789. The parent applications are incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.
  • FIELD OF THE INVENTION
  • The invention relates to golf clubs, and more particularly, to metal wood and utility-type golf clubs having improved mass characteristics.
  • BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
  • The complexities of golf club design are known. The specifications for each component of the club (i.e., the club head, shaft, grip, and subcomponents thereof) directly impact the performance of the club. Thus, by varying the design specifications, a golf club can be tailored to have specific performance characteristics.
  • The design of club heads has long been studied. Among the more prominent considerations in club head design are loft, lie, face angle, horizontal face bulge, vertical face roll, center of gravity location, rotational moment of inertia, material selection, and overall head weight. While this basic set of criteria is generally the focus of golf club designers, several other design aspects must also be addressed. The interior design of the club head may be tailored to achieve particular characteristics, such as the inclusion of a hosel or a shaft attachment means, perimeter weights on the club head, and fillers within the hollow club heads.
  • Golf club heads must also be strong to withstand the stresses that occur during repeated collisions between the golf club and the golf balls. The loading that occurs during this transient event can create a peak force of over 2,000 lbs. Thus, a major challenge is to design the club face and club body to resist permanent deformation or fracture. Conventional hollow metal wood drivers made from titanium typically have a uniform face thickness exceeding 2.5 mm or 0.10 inch to ensure structural integrity of the club head.
  • Players generally seek a metal wood driver and golf ball combination that delivers maximum distance and landing accuracy. The distance a ball travels after impact is dictated by the magnitude and direction of the ball's initial velocity and the ball's rotational velocity or spin. Environmental conditions, including atmospheric pressure, humidity, temperature, and wind speed, further influence the ball's flight. However, these environmental effects are beyond the control of the golf equipment designers. Golf ball landing accuracy is driven by a number of factors as well. Some of these factors are attributed to club head design, such as center of gravity and moment of inertia.
  • The current trend in golf club manufacturing is to produce large volume club heads in order to maximize the moment of inertia of the club head. Concerned that improvements to golf equipment may render the game less challenging, the United States Golf Association (USGA), the governing body for the rules of golf in the United States, has specifications for the performance of golf equipment. These performance specifications dictate the size and weight of a conforming golf ball or a conforming golf club. USGA rules limit a number of parameters for drivers. For example, the volume of drivers has been limited to 460±10 cubic centimeters. The length of the shaft, except for putters, has been capped at 48 inches. The driver club heads must fit inside a 5-inch square and the height from the sole to the crown cannot exceed 2.8 inches. The USGA has further limited the coefficient of restitution of the impact between a driver and a golf ball to 0.830.
  • The USGA has also observed that the rotational moment of inertia of drivers, or the club's resistance to twisting on off-center hits, has tripled from about 1990 to 2005, which coincides with the introduction of oversize drivers. Since drivers with higher rotational moment of inertia are more forgiving on off-center hits, the USGA was concerned that further increases in the club head's inertia may reduce the challenge of the game, and instituted in 2006 a limit on the moment of inertia for drivers at 5900 g·cm±100 g·cm2 (590 kg·mm2±10 kg·mm2) or 32.259 oz·in2±0.547 oz·in2.
  • The USGA limits moment of inertia for drivers, as the calculated moment of inertia with respect to a vertical axis through the center of gravity of the club head. Larger MOIs about the vertical axis preserve more ball speed on off-center impacts. However, when a golf club head approaches a golf ball during the downswing the golf club head rotates around the shaft or hosel of the club. The moment of inertia around this “hosel axis” tends to be significantly larger than the moment of inertia around the vertical axis through the center of gravity. The moment of inertia about the hosel or shaft axis is the rotational mass or “foot print” of the club that the golfer must work to overcome just prior to impact in order to hit a straight shot. In large-volume drivers manufactured to have large moments of inertia around the vertical axis, this difference in moment of inertia is even more exaggerated. Players may find it difficult to control a club head having a very large moment of inertia around the hosel axis, because it requires more work during the downswing to “square” the face and hit straight shots.
  • The '326 parent patent application teaches methods for optimizing the mass properties of golf club heads, having a smaller volume or smaller footprint, an optimized moment of inertia with respect to the hosel axis and/or an optimized rotational mass footprint. This parent patent application also teaches golf club heads having a large moment of inertia around the vertical axis through the center of gravity relative to a moment of inertia around the hosel axis.
  • However, there remains a need for a golf club head having an optimized or reduced rotational mass footprint while still possessing the shape and size of a full-sized club head.
  • SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
  • One embodiment of the present invention is directed to a hollow body golf club head having an outer shell and an inner frame. The outer shell comprises one or more lightweight members, preferably on the crown, the skirt or the sole. Preferably, these lightweight members are made from low density metals, metal-polymer composites, reinforced plastics and plastics, among others. The inner frame is disposed within the outer shell and is preferably connected to the sole and the hitting face. The inner frame preferably fits within a 4 inches×4 inches×2.8 inches envelope and may carry discrete weights or masses. Such weights or masses are located away from the center of gravity or the geometric center of the club head to optimize the moment of inertia (MOI) of the club head about both the vertical axis running through the center of gravity or geometric center of the club head, hereinafter referred to as the “y-axis,” and the axis running through the center of the shaft of the golf club, hereinafter referred to as the “hosel axis.” In an alternative embodiment, the weights or masses can be distributed throughout the inner frame.
  • In another embodiment, the hollow golf club head comprises an outer shell and a hitting face. The hitting face and a portion of the skirt proximate the toe form a curved blade in the shape of a sickle or battle ax and an inner support bridges the toe end of the curved blade to the hosel for structural support.
  • A golf club head of the present invention preferably has a MOI about the y-axis between about 470 kg·mm2 and about 600 kg·mm2 and MOI about the hosel axis between about 600 kg·mm2 and about 725 kg·mm2.
  • According to an embodiment of the invention, the ratio of MOI (y-axis) to MOI (hosel axis) is preferably greater than about 0.55. More preferably, this ratio is greater than about 0.75. In certain embodiments, this ratio is greater than about 1.00, which means that advantageously MOI (hosel axis) can be lower than MOI (y-axis).
  • BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
  • FIG. 1 is a graph showing the preferred ranges of moment of inertia about a y-axis and about a hosel axis for golf club heads of the present invention;
  • FIGS. 2, 4, 6, 8 and 10 are bottom plan views of idealized golf club heads of the present invention;
  • FIGS. 3, 5, 7, 9 and 11 are bottom plan views of golf club heads according to the present invention;
  • FIG. 12A is a top perspective view of a multi-material driver club of the present invention; FIG. 12B is similar to FIG. 12A with portions removed for better clarity; FIG. 12C is the bottom perspective view of the club head of FIG. 12A; FIG. 12D is the bottom perspective view of the club head of FIG. 12B;
  • FIG. 13 is a top plan view of a golf club head of the present invention;
  • FIG. 14 is a cross-sectional view of a golf club head of the present invention
  • FIG. 15 is a top view of another embodiment of the present invention showing a club head with an outer shell and an inner frame
  • FIG. 16 is a side view of the embodiment of FIG. 15;
  • FIG. 17 is a top cut-away view of another embodiment of the present invention showing a club head having a curved blade hitting face; and
  • FIG. 18 is a top view of a club head showing a lightweight member.
  • DETAILED DESCRIPTION
  • Rotational moment of inertia (“MOI” or “inertia”) in golf clubs is well known in the art, and is fully discussed in a number of references, including U.S. Pat. No. 4,420,156, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. When the inertia is too low, the club head tends to rotate excessively from off-center hits. A golf club head having a higher moment of inertia will resist rotation due to an off-center impact between the club face and a golf ball, thereby reducing loss of ball speed, mitigating the tendency for the ball to hook or slice and increasing flight distance and subsequently landing accuracy. The present invention is directed to a hollow body golf club head having a hosel, face, crown, skirt and sole, wherein the club head further comprises discrete concentrations of weight or mass located away from the center of gravity or the geometric center of the club head to optimize the moment of inertia (MOI) of the club head about both the vertical axis running through the center of gravity or geometric center of the club head, hereinafter referred to as the “y-axis,” and the axis running through the center of the shaft of the golf club, hereinafter referred to as the “hosel axis.” In particular, the present invention is directed to a metal-wood or utility golf club head having the above-described mass characteristics.
  • Current driver clubs have a volume of up to the USGA limit of 460 cc. Higher volume can lead to higher MOI (hosel axis), which demands more work from the golfer to control the club, such that the face is perpendicular to the target line at impact. Lowering the MOI (hosel axis) would reduce the physical demands on the golfer, while maintaining a high MOI (y-axis) would maintain the desirable forgiveness in ball speed reduction for off-center hits.
  • The golf club head of the present invention preferably has a volume between about 390 cc and about 420 cc. The inventor of the present invention has determined that the MOI (y-axis) is preferably between about 450 kg·mm2 to about 600 kg·mm2 and more preferably between about 470 kg·mm2 and about 600 kg·mm2. The MOI (y-axis) can further be between about 545 kg·mm2 and about 600 kg·mm2. The MOI (hosel axis) is preferably between about 600 kg·mm2 and 800 kg·mm2 and more preferably between about 600 kg·mm2 and about 725 kg·mm2. The shaded area of the graph of FIG. 1 shows the preferred range and the broken lines within the shaded area show the more preferred range of MOI values about both the y-axis and the hosel axis for golf club heads of the present invention. These preferred MOI (y-axis) and MOI (hosel axis) values represent less physical demands on the golfer during impacts with golf balls and maintaining desirable forgiveness in ball speed reduction for off-center hits.
  • Lower rotational footprint in accordance to the present invention can be achieved for club head having volumes up to and beyond about 460 cc, when the club head is made from multiple materials, including one or more plastics or when discretionary weight usable to affect changes in mass characteristics are moved inward spaced from the perimeter of the club head, as discussed below.
  • Additionally, the ratio of the MOI (y-axis) to the MOI (hosel axis) is preferably greater than about 0.55, but is more preferably greater than about 0.75. As shown below, this ratio can be greater than 1.00, which indicates that MOI (hosel axis) can be made lower than MOI (y-axis). This is another preferred embodiment of the present invention, because it preserves the desirable high MOI (y-axis) while minimizing the rotational foot print or MOI (hosel axis).
  • Another way to control the MOI (hosel axis) is to couple the MOI (y-axis) to the volume of the club head, since lowering the volume of the club head is one way of lowering the MOI (hosel axis). Preferably, the volume of the club head is greater than 350 cc, but is more preferably between about 390 cc and about 420 cc. The ratio of the MOI (y-axis) to the volume of the club head is preferably greater than about 1.30 kg·mm2/cm3 for a club head having a volume of about 350 cc or greater. The ratio of the MOI (y-axis) to the volume of the club head is more preferably greater than about 1.45 kg·mm2/cm3 and more preferably greater than about 1.50 kg·mm2/cm3 for club heads with volume of about 350 cc or greater. Preferably, this ratio is less than about 1.70 kg·mm2/cm3.
  • Yet another way to control the MOI (hosel axis) is to limit the distance of the center of gravity to be from about ⅔ inch to about 1 inch measured orthogonally from hitting face. Without being bound to any particular theory, in large or oversized driver clubs, the center of gravity can be located more than about 1 inch from the hitting face to provide a larger sweet spot on the hitting face. By limiting how far back the center of gravity can be located, i.e., from about ⅔ inch to about 1 inch from the hitting face, one can control the volume of the club and the MOI (hosel axis) of the club, while allowing the MOI (y-axis) to be between 450 kg·mm2 and about 650 kg·mm2, more preferably between 500 kg·mm2 and 600 kg·mm2.
  • The driver club of the present invention possesses substantially similar MOI properties of the larger 460 cc driver club but with smaller volume, and is easier for golfers to control during the downswing.
  • In accordance with one aspect of the present invention, the weight can be distributed around the club head in an inventive manner to achieve the desirable MOI (y-axis) to MOI (hosel axis) ratio and/or the desirable MOI (y-axis) to club head volume factor. For objects rotating about a known axis of rotation, moment of inertia I can be calculated using the following equation:

  • I=mr2
  • where m is the mass of the object and r is the distance of that mass from the axis of rotation.
  • The MOI of a rectangular object about an axis can be described by the equation

  • I= 1/12·m(a 2 +b 2)
  • where a is the length of the rectangle is and b is the width of the rectangle.
  • When MOI must be calculated about an axis of rotation going through a point other than the center of mass, one can determine MOI using the parallel axis theorem. The MOI of such an object can be calculated using the equation

  • I=mr 2 +me 2
  • where e is the distance of the center of mass of the object from the axis of rotation. The above equations were used to determine MOI values of the idealized golf club heads shown in FIGS. 2, 4, 6, 8 and 10.
  • The golf club head of the present invention may utilize a number of mass distribution patterns, including those shown in FIGS. 2, 4, 6, 8 and 10, to optimize MOI (y-axis) and the MOI (hosel axis). The mass characteristics of each idealized club head are summarized in Table 1. The idealized club heads of FIGS. 2, 4, 6, 8 and 10 fit into the prescribed USGA-prescribed 5-inch square and have a mass of 200 grams. For each pattern of mass distribution, 200 grams of mass were divided into two portions of the club head, portion A and portion B. In one iteration, portion A contains two-thirds, or 133 grams, of the mass of the club head, while portion B contains one-third, or 67 grams, of the mass of the club head. In a second iteration, portion A contains three-fourths, or 150 grams, of the mass of the club head, while portion B contains one-fourth, or 50 grams, of the mass of the club head. For each idealized club head, the y-axis runs through the geometric center of the club head. In this illustration, mass portions A and B are located adjacent to the perimeter of the 5 inch by 5 inch envelope prescribed by the USGA. Table 1 shows MOI values about both a y-axis running through the geometric center and the hosel axis of an idealized golf club head. The hosel axis of the club heads shown in FIGS. 2, 4, 6, 8 and 10 runs through point C. For FIGS. 2, 4, 6 and 8, point C is located 4 inches from toe edge 18 and 0.5 inches from face edge 20. For FIG. 10, point C is located 4.5 inches from toe edge 18 and 0.5 inches from face edge 20. Table 1 provides the ratio of the MOI (y-axis) to the MOI (hosel axis) for each iteration of mass distribution, as well as the ratio of MOI (y-axis) to volume for each iteration of mass distribution
  • TABLE 1
    MOI MOI
    M (club head) m (A) m (B) (y-axis) (hosel axis) MOI (y-axis)/ MOI (y-axis)/volume
    [g] [g] [g] [kg · mm2] [kg · mm2] MOI (hosel axis) 390 cc 420 cc 460 cc
    FIG. 2 200 133 67 793.69 1097.62 0.72 2.04 1.89 1.73
    200 150 50 793.69 847.36 0.94 2.04 1.89 1.73
    FIG. 4 200 133 67 879.41 1283.48 0.69 2.25 2.09 1.91
    200 150 50 857.98 986.74 0.87 2.20 2.04 1.87
    FIG. 6 200 133 67 879.50 597.06 1.47 2.26 2.09 1.91
    200 150 50 858.05 471.94 1.82 2.20 2.04 1.87
    FIG. 8 200 133 67 836.60 1026.12 0.82 2.15 1.99 1.82
    200 150 50 825.88 793.73 1.04 2.12 1.97 1.80
    FIG. 200 133 67 836.61 1333.58 0.63 2.15 1.99 1.82
    10 200 150 50 825.89 1148.55 0.72 2.12 1.97 1.80

    As shown in the table above, a club head fitting snugly inside a 5-inch square having a mass of 200 grams and mass distributions as depicted in FIGS. 2, 4, 6, 8 and 10 meet the preferred ratio of MOI (y-axis) to MOI (hosel axis). However, the calculated MOI (y-axis) values are higher than the 590 kg·mm2 USGA limit for the idealized shapes, it is expected that for commercial club head, see e.g., FIGS. 3, 5, 7, 9 and 11, the MOI (y-axis) would be within the USGA limit due to the smaller footprints of the commercial club heads. Another way to reduce the MOI (y-axis) is to reduce the mass of areas “B” in FIGS. 2, 4, 6, 8 and 10.
  • Alternatively, for lower volume club heads, such as those having volumes between 390 cc and 420 cc, mass areas “B” is moved toward mass area “A” such that the club head fits snugly inside a 4-inch by 4-inch envelope. Point “C” would be located 3 inches from toe edge 18 and 0.5 inch from face edge 20 for FIGS. 2, 4, 6 and 8, and be located 3.5 inches from toe edge 18 and 0.5 inch from face edge 20 for FIG. 10. Table 2 provides the ratio of MOI (y-axis) to MOI (hosel axis) and the ratio of MOI (y-axis) to volume for this configuration.
  • TABLE 2
    MOI MOI
    M (club head) m (A) m (B) (y-axis) (hosel axis) MOI (y-axis)/ MOI (y-axis)/volume
    [g] [g] [g] [kg · mm2] [kg · mm2] MOI (hosel axis) 390 cc 420 cc 460 cc
    FIG. 2 200 133 67 430.00 665.00 0.55 1.10 1.02 0.93
    200 150 50 430.74 523.45 0.82 1.10 1.03 0.94
    FIG. 4 200 133 67 487.61 730.57 0.67 1.25 1.16 1.06
    200 150 50 473.97 572.37 0.83 1.22 1.13 1.03
    FIG. 6 200 133 67 487.61 341.63 1.43 1.25 1.16 1.06
    200 150 50 473.97 280.00 1.69 1.22 1.13 1.03
    FIG. 8 200 133 67 476.80 622.53 0.77 1.22 1.14 1.04
    200 150 50 465.86 491.35 0.95 1.19 1.11 1.01
    FIG. 200 133 67 505.00 926.76 0.54 1.29 1.20 1.10
    10 200 150 50 498.59 814.74 0.61 1.28 1.19 1.08
  • The MOI (y-axis) values for a 4-inch by 4-inch envelope are all under the USGA limit of 590 kg·mm2. This design envelope can be enlarged to about 4.5-inch by 4.5-inch design envelope without exceeding the USGA limit. The ratio of MOI (y-axis) to MOI (hosel axis) is greater than about 0.55, preferably greater than about 0.75. Advantageously, in accordance with the present invention, the embodiment of FIG. 6 shows that the MOI (hosel axis) can be designed to be lower than the MOI (y-axis), i.e., the rotational foot print can be reduced while maintaining a high MOI (y-axis) to limit the adverse effects of off-centered hits. In other words, the ratio of MOI (y-axis) to MOI (hosel axis) is greater than about 1.00.
  • The ratio of MOI (y-axis) to club head volume for this embodiment is from about 0.90 kg·mm2/cm3 to about 1.30 kg·mm2/cm3. This ratio is preferably greater than about 0.90 kg·mm2/cm3, more preferably greater than 1.00 and more preferably greater than about 1.10. In one example, for club heads that can fit inside a 4.5-inch by 4.5-inch design envelope, this ratio can be greater than about 1.20, preferably greater than about 1.40 and more preferably greater than about 1.60. This ratio should be less than about 1.70 kg·mm2/cm3.
  • In accordance to another aspect of the present invention, MOI (hosel axis) of less than about 850 kg·mm2, which is believed to be the amount of rotational mass that can be controlled by better players or low handicapped players, while maintaining MOI (y-axis) at more than 470 kg·mm2. For higher handicapped players, the MOI (hosel axis) should be kept to about 750 kg·mm2 or less. On the other hand, the present invention allows MOI (hosel axis), MOI (y-axis) and any of the ratios discussed herewithin to be customized for any individual player after proper fittings.
  • FIGS. 3, 5, 7, 9 and 11 show driver-style club head 10 having concentrated areas of mass 12 allocated on the sole in patterns similar to those of the idealized club heads of FIGS. 2, 4, 6, 8 and 10, respectively. A club head of the present invention may have a pattern of mass distribution on the sole of the club head as shown in FIGS. 3, 5, 7, 9 and 11. Concentrated areas of mass 12 are located on the sole of golf club 10 to cause the center of gravity of the club to remain relatively low. In order to maximize MOI about a vertical axis running through the center of gravity or through the geometric center of the club head, and to minimize the MOI about the axis running through the shaft and hosel of the club head, mass may be allocated on the sole of the club head in regions around the base of the hosel, as shown in FIGS. 3, 5, 7 and 9. To control the location of the center of gravity, the sole may include other concentrated areas of mass, such as toward the back and toe as in FIGS. 3 and 5. Alternatively, other areas of mass may be located toward the face and toe as in FIG. 7, or toward the back as in FIG. 9. A “pseudo I-beam” pattern of mass distribution wherein mass is concentrated toward the face edge and toward the back, as in FIG. 11, may also be utilized.
  • The weight distribution data and conclusions presented above and in Tables 1 and 2, and FIGS. 2-11 are for illustration only and do not limit the scope of the present invention. MOI (y-axis) values were calculated about the geometric center for ease of illustration, since, unlike the centers of gravity, the geometric center does not change when the masses A and B are moved around. Furthermore, 5-inch by 5-inch square and 4-inch by 4-inch square design envelopes are used for the illustration; however, when smaller volume club heads are used as discussed below an intermediate size or smaller envelope may be used. Those of ordinary skill in the art can follow the procedure described herein to design driver club heads that are within the scope of the present invention.
  • Areas of concentrated mass, such as portions A and B of the club heads of FIGS. 2, 4, 6, 8 and 10; areas 12 of the golf club heads of FIGS. 3, 5, 7, 9 and 11; and other discrete portions of mass in the golf club heads may comprises high density metals such as stainless steel, tungsten or iron. These areas may also comprise high density polymer composite. The material surrounding these concentrated areas of mass preferably comprises a less dense material, for instance metals such as aluminum, stainless steel, magnesium or titanium, or a polymer composite with high density fillers such as tungsten powder. Alternatively, areas of concentrated mass may comprise the same material as that surrounding the area of concentrated mass, however having a greater thickness than the surrounding material.
  • In another embodiment of the present invention, club head 10 comprises multiple materials with a section of the club head comprises the lightest material of the club head. The parent application discloses a wood-type club head with weights from the crown, sole and skirt moved aft or to the perimeter to maximize the MOI of the club head. More specifically, the mid-section of said club head is made from a lightweight material, such as carbon fiber composites, thermoplastic or thermoset polymers or lightweight metals. It had been shown in the parent application that a 460 cc/200 g club head made from titanium hitting cup, titanium aft cup and carbon fiber tube mid-section can achieve significantly better c.g. position and MOI properties than the same club made out of titanium alone.
  • All of the multi-material club heads disclosed in the parent case can be used in the current invention, preferably with the volume reduced to about 390 cc-420 cc, to achieve the preferred MOI (y-axis)/MOI (shaft axis) and MOI (y-axis)/volume ratios, described above.
  • Another inventive multi-material club head is shown in FIGS. 12A-12D. FIG. 12A shows club head 30 made from three different materials. Club head 30 comprises hitting cup 32, which includes the hitting face, frame section 34, which includes crown and sole bridges/connectors and crown and sole plates 36. Hitting cup 32 is made from the material with the highest specific gravity, such as titanium, stainless steel, magnesium. Frame 34 is made from a material that is lighter than the material of hitting cup 32 but heavier than the material of the crown and sole plates 36. Preferably, frame 34 is sufficiently sturdy to provide support for the crown and sole plates 36, and to retain the shape of club head 30. Frame 34 can be made out of aluminum, magnesium, or reinforced or unreinforced plastic/polymer. Crown and sole plates 36 are made from the lightest material in club head 30, such as aluminum or reinforced or unreinforced plastic/polymer to allow more weight to be deployed near the hitting face and the back of the club head to achieve the preferred MOI (y-axis)/MOI (shaft axis) and MOI (y-axis)/volume ratios.
  • FIGS. 12B and 12D shows club head 30 without the crown and sole plates to more clearly show hitting cup 32 and frame 34. FIG. 12C shows the bottom view of club head 30 to illustrate more clearly sole plates 36.
  • Suitable plastics/polymers for use in club head 30 include polyetheretherketone (PEEK) commercially available as Tecapeek™ from Ensinger, Inc. from Washington, Pa. Preferably, a 30% glass or carbon reinforced PEEK, which has increased tensile strength, is used to increase the mechanical strength of the plastic. Relevant properties of some of the preferred materials are summarized below.
  • Tensile Elongation
    Density Strength Hardness Modulus
    Material (g/cc) (MPa) (Rockwell M) (GPa)
    Tungsten 19.3 400
    Stainless Steel 7.8 210
    6-4 Titanium 4.5 110
    Aluminum 2.7 70
    PEEK 30% 1.44 208 107 13
    carbon reinforced
    PEEK 30% glass 1.49 157 103 9.7
    reinforced
    PEEK 1.32 97 99 3.6

    Other suitable plastics include, but are not limited to
  • Tensile Elongation
    Density Shore D Rockwell Strength Modulus
    Plastics (g/cc) Hardness Hardness (MPa) (GPa)
    Acrylonitrile 1.02-1.2  103M 28-138 1.4-2.8
    Butadiene (avg.
    Styrene ~50)
    (ABS), impact
    grade, molded
    ABS + 10% 1.08 70 105M 43.1 3.5
    cellulose fibers
    (CF)
    Polyetherimide 1.27 75 109M 104.9 3.1
    (PEI)
    PEI + 5% 1.32 75-80 109M 104.9 3.1
    cellulose fibers
    (CF)
    Nylon 66 + 1.14-1.49 120R 230 2.21-17  
    20% CF
    Polypropylene  0.886  92R 33.1  1.31
    (PP)
  • Exemplary multi-material club heads 30 having a volume of 410 cc made from various preferred materials are illustrated below.
  • MOI MOI
    Hitting cup Crown/Sole (y-axis) (y-axis)/
    32 Frame 34 Plates 35 Mass (g) kg · mm2 volume
    Titanium Titanium Titanium 197 416 1.01
    Titanium Titanium Plastic 197 449 1.10
    Titanium Aluminum Aluminum 197 456 1.11
    Titanium Aluminum Platic 197 470 1.15
    Titanium Plastic Plastic 197 484 1.18

    As demonstrated, club head 30 made from multi-materials can achieve significant MOI (y-axis) while retaining a smaller volume or footprint.
  • According to another embodiment of the present invention, and as shown in FIG. 13, golf club head 10 comprises an exterior surface having a horizontal bulge radius, defined as a radius of curvature Rb, extending from heel 22 to toe 24 and measured along the horizontal midline between the top and bottom of face 30. Golf club head 10 further comprises a vertical roll radius, shown in FIG. 14 and defined as a radius of curvature Rr, extending from top 26 to bottom 28 of face 30 and measured along the vertical midline between the toe and heel edges of face 30. A golf club head of the present invention having a MOI about the y-axis equal to or greater than about 450 kg·mm2 and less than about 500 kg·mm2 preferably has a horizontal bulge radius of about 12 inches and a vertical roll radius of about 10 inches. A golf club head having a MOI about the y-axis equal to or greater than about 500 kg·mm2 and less than about 550 kg·mm2 preferably has a horizontal bulge radius of about 13 inches and a vertical roll radius of about 10 inches. A golf club head having a MOI about the y-axis equal to or greater than about 550 kg·mm2 preferably has a horizontal bulge radius of about 14 inches and a vertical face roll radius of about 10 inches.
  • Referring to FIGS. 15 and 16, another embodiment of the present invention is illustrated. Club head 50 preferably is a full-sized club head, i.e., has a volume from about 420 cc to about 460 cc and preferably about 460 cc. Club head 50 comprises hitting face 52, outer shell 54 and inner frame 56. Preferably, outer shell 54 fits within an envelope of 5 inches×5 inches×2.8 inches prescribed by the USGA, and inner frame 56 fits within a smaller envelope of 4 inches×4 inches×2.8 inches. The smaller envelope as discussed above and in the '326 parent patent application can provide club heads optimized MOIs in the vertical and hosel axes.
  • To optimize MOI, outer shell 54 is made from strong lightweight materials, such as metal plastic composites, carbon fiber composites, aluminum, reinforced or unreinforced plastics, e.g., PEEK, carbon fiber/glass fiber reinforced PEEK, ABS, ABS(CF), PEI, PEI(CF), Nylon 66 (CF) or PP, described above. Lightweight materials can be used as part of the crown, skirt and the sole. Preferably, the sole is reinforced as described below to withstand impacts with the ground during play. Discretionary weights available from using lightweight materials are distributed throughout inner frame 56 or are attached as discrete weight(s) A and/or B to inner frame 56.
  • Discrete weights A and B can be attached in similar manners shown in FIGS. 2-11, except that these weights are attached to inner frame 56 instead of to the sole, hitting face or back as shown. Since the sole has to withstand multiple impacts with the ground during play, the sole especially when made from lightweight material is supported by inner frame 56. As best shown in FIG. 16, inner frame 56 is disposed on sole 58 to advantageously provide structural support to the sole. Inner frame 56 is preferably made from strong, resilient materials such as metals, e.g., stainless steel, aluminum, titanium. Metals with high specific gravity are preferred when the discretionary weights are distributed throughout inner frame 56. Metals with lower specific gravity are preferred when the discretionary weights are discrete weights A and B attached to inner frame 56. In a preferred embodiment, not including the hitting face the weight of inner frame 56 is higher than the weight of outer shell 54.
  • One advantage of using a lightweight outer shell 54 and inner frame 56 with discretionary weights disposed thereon is that club head 50, which is preferably a full-sized club head having a volume up to 460 cc can have optimized MOIs in the vertical and hosel axes of a club head with a smaller foot print, described above and in the '326 parent application.
  • As best shown in FIG. 15, inner frame 56 is substantially centered with respect to hitting face 52 in the toe-heel direction. Due to this relative positioning, sweet spot 60 is located at substantially the same distance from hosel 62 in inventive club head 50 as in conventional 460 cc club head, as best illustrated by outer shell 54. The advantage of having sweet spot 60 substantially in the same location as the sweet spot in conventional full-sized club head is that the learning curve for golfers switching from conventional full-sized club head to inventive club head 50 to take advantage of optimized MOIs is minimal, because the golfers can address the balls the same way and drive the balls with the same swing. Visually, inventive club head 50 has the same appearance as a full-sized club head.
  • Preferably, the MOIs in the vertical and hosel axes and MOI ratios for club head 50 with inner frame 56 are preferably similar to those listed in Table 2.
  • Referring to FIG. 17, another embodiment of the present invention is shown. Club head 70 comprises hitting cup 72, which includes hitting face 74 and wing 76, which is formed from a portion of the skirt proximate to the toe of the club head. Hitting face 74 and wing 76 visually have the form of a curved blade, a sickle or battle ax. Club head 70 further comprises inner bridge 78 that connects hosel 62 to wing 76. Inner bridge 78 assists hitting cup 72 resisting deformation caused by a moment about hosel 62 from impacts with golf balls. Advantageously, inner bridge 78 can be a shock absorber to decrease the vibration of wing 76 caused by impacts with golf balls. Alternatively, inner bridge 78 may comprise multiple telescopic members supported by helical or leaf spring disposed therewithin to absorb vibration. Alternatively, inner bridge 78 can be a leaf spring. Furthermore, inner bridge 78 can be curved and has a concave shape relative to hitting face 74 to resist bending of wing 76.
  • Discrete weight A can be added near hosel 62 and discrete weight B can be added at wing 76, similar to the embodiments shown in FIGS. 6 and 7 to optimize MOIs about the vertical and hosel axes. Preferably, club head 70 fits within a 4 inches×4 inches×2.8 inches envelope or a 4.5 inches×4.5 inches×2.8 inches envelope, and the MOIs in the vertical and hosel axes and MOI ratios for club head 70 are preferably similar to those listed in Table 2. Club head 70 further comprises outer shell 78 of lightweight materials discussed above.
  • FIG. 18 illustrates an exemplary embodiment or appearance of club head 10, 30, 50, 70 using lightweight materials. Club head 10, 30, 50, 70 has lightweight crown 82, which comprises relatively rigid ribs 84 preferably made out of metal or reinforced plastics and inserts 86 made from low specific gravity plastics. Ribs 84 provide structural supports for crown 82 and inserts 86 provide weight savings that can contribute to the discretionary weights A and B. In one embodiment, crown 82 comprises an inner crown made from lightweight material and an outer crown 84 with holes 86 punched therefrom.
  • While various descriptions of the present invention are described above, it should be understood that the various features of each embodiment could be used alone or in any combination thereof. Therefore, this invention is not to be limited to only the specifically preferred embodiments depicted herein. Further, it should be understood that variations and modifications within the spirit and scope of the invention might occur to those skilled in the art to which the invention pertains. Accordingly, all expedient modifications readily attainable by one versed in the art from the disclosure set forth herein that are within the scope and spirit of the present invention are to be included as further embodiments of the present invention. The scope of the present invention is accordingly defined as set forth in the appended claims.

Claims (20)

1. A golf club comprising a shaft and a club head,
wherein the club head comprises a y-axis running the in the vertical direction through the geometric center of the golf club head and a hosel axis running parallel to the center of the shaft and through a hosel base,
wherein the ratio of the MOI (y-axis) to the MOI (hosel axis) is greater than about 0.55,
wherein the club head comprises an outer shell and an inner frame disposed inside the outer shell and the inner frame is attached to a sole and a hitting face of the club head, and the inner frame is centered relative to the hitting face.
2. The golf club head of claim 1, wherein the MOI (hosel axis) is equal to or less than about 800 kg·mm2.
3. The golf club head of claim 2, wherein the MOI (hosel axis) is equal to or less than about 710 kg·mm2.
4. The golf club head of claim 2, wherein the MOI (y-axis) is equal to or greater than about 450 kg·mm2.
5. The golf club head of claim 2, wherein the MOI (y-axis) is equal to or greater than about 470 kg·mm2.
6. The golf club of claim 1, wherein the ratio of the MOI (y-axis) to the MOI (hosel axis) is greater than about 0.75.
7. The golf club of claim 6, wherein the ratio of the MOI (y-axis) to the MOI (hosel axis) is greater than about 1.0.
8. The golf club of claim 1, wherein the volume of the club head is between about 420 cc and about 460 cc.
9. The golf club of claim 1, wherein the inner frame of the club head fits within an envelope of about 4.5 inches×4.5 inches×2.8 inches.
10. The golf club of claim 9, wherein the inner frame of the club head fits within an envelope of about 4.0 inches×4.0 inches×2.8 inches.
11. The golf club of claim 1, wherein the MOI (y-axis) is between about 470 kg·mm2 and about 600 kg·mm2 and wherein the MOI (hosel axis) is between about 600 kg·mm2 and about 725 kg·mm2.
12. The golf club of claim 1, wherein the MOI (y-axis) is between about 545 kg·mm2 and about 600 kg·mm2 and wherein the MOI (hosel axis) is between about 600 kg·mm2 and about 725 kg·mm2.
13. The golf club of claim 1, wherein the golf club is constructed from multiple materials
14. The golf club of claim 1, wherein the weight of the inner frame is higher than the weight of the outer shell.
15. The golf club of claim 14, wherein at least one discrete weight is attached to the inner frame.
16. A golf club comprising a shaft and a club head,
wherein the club head comprises a y-axis running the in the vertical direction through the geometric center of the golf club head and a hosel axis running parallel to the center of the shaft and through a hosel base,
wherein the ratio of the MOI (y-axis) to the MOI (hosel axis) is greater than about 0.55, wherein a hitting face and a toe-skirt wing of the club head form a hitting cup and an inner bridge connects a hosel to the toe-skirt wing to support the toe-skirt wing.
17. The golf club of claim 16, wherein the inner bridge comprises a spring.
18. The golf club of claim 16, wherein the inner bridge is convex relative to the hitting face.
19. The golf club of claim 16, wherein the MOI (hosel axis) is equal to or less than about 800 kg·mm2.
20. The golf club of claim 16, wherein the MOI (y-axis) is equal to or less than about 450 kg·mm2.
US12/508,752 2006-10-25 2009-07-24 Golf club with optimum moments of inertia in the vertical and hosel axes Active 2027-04-18 US8267808B2 (en)

Priority Applications (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US12/508,752 US8267808B2 (en) 2006-10-25 2009-07-24 Golf club with optimum moments of inertia in the vertical and hosel axes
US13/238,678 US8333668B2 (en) 2006-10-25 2011-09-21 Golf club with optimum moments of inertia in the vertical and hosel axes
US13/714,160 US8636608B2 (en) 2006-10-25 2012-12-13 Golf club with optimum moments of inertia in the vertical and hosel axes
US14/152,242 US9302161B2 (en) 2006-10-25 2014-01-10 Golf club with optimum moments of inertia in the vertical and hosel axis

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US11/552,729 US7497789B2 (en) 2006-10-25 2006-10-25 Metal wood club with improved moment of inertia
US12/339,326 US8025591B2 (en) 2006-10-25 2008-12-19 Golf club with optimum moments of inertia in the vertical and hosel axes
US12/508,752 US8267808B2 (en) 2006-10-25 2009-07-24 Golf club with optimum moments of inertia in the vertical and hosel axes

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US12/339,326 Continuation-In-Part US8025591B2 (en) 2006-09-18 2008-12-19 Golf club with optimum moments of inertia in the vertical and hosel axes

Related Child Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US13/238,678 Division US8333668B2 (en) 2006-10-25 2011-09-21 Golf club with optimum moments of inertia in the vertical and hosel axes

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20090286615A1 true US20090286615A1 (en) 2009-11-19
US8267808B2 US8267808B2 (en) 2012-09-18

Family

ID=41316686

Family Applications (4)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US12/508,752 Active 2027-04-18 US8267808B2 (en) 2006-10-25 2009-07-24 Golf club with optimum moments of inertia in the vertical and hosel axes
US13/238,678 Active US8333668B2 (en) 2006-10-25 2011-09-21 Golf club with optimum moments of inertia in the vertical and hosel axes
US13/714,160 Active US8636608B2 (en) 2006-10-25 2012-12-13 Golf club with optimum moments of inertia in the vertical and hosel axes
US14/152,242 Active 2027-05-18 US9302161B2 (en) 2006-10-25 2014-01-10 Golf club with optimum moments of inertia in the vertical and hosel axis

Family Applications After (3)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US13/238,678 Active US8333668B2 (en) 2006-10-25 2011-09-21 Golf club with optimum moments of inertia in the vertical and hosel axes
US13/714,160 Active US8636608B2 (en) 2006-10-25 2012-12-13 Golf club with optimum moments of inertia in the vertical and hosel axes
US14/152,242 Active 2027-05-18 US9302161B2 (en) 2006-10-25 2014-01-10 Golf club with optimum moments of inertia in the vertical and hosel axis

Country Status (1)

Country Link
US (4) US8267808B2 (en)

Cited By (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20100273567A1 (en) * 2010-02-24 2010-10-28 Sri Sports Limited Golf club
US8951142B2 (en) 2010-02-24 2015-02-10 Sri Sports Limited Golf club
US20170136316A1 (en) * 2015-11-18 2017-05-18 Acushnet Company Multi-material golf club head
US20180111027A1 (en) * 2015-11-18 2018-04-26 Acushnet Company Multi-material golf club head
US20190046845A1 (en) * 2017-08-10 2019-02-14 Taylor Made Golf Company, Inc. Golf club heads
US20220258016A1 (en) * 2013-03-14 2022-08-18 Karsten Manufacturing Corporation Golf club heads with optimized characteristics and related methods
US11701557B2 (en) * 2017-08-10 2023-07-18 Taylor Made Golf Company, Inc. Golf club heads

Families Citing this family (50)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US8419569B2 (en) 2006-10-25 2013-04-16 Acushnet Company Metal wood club with improved moment of inertia
US9498688B2 (en) 2006-10-25 2016-11-22 Acushnet Company Golf club head with stiffening member
US9320949B2 (en) 2006-10-25 2016-04-26 Acushnet Company Golf club head with flexure
US9636559B2 (en) 2006-10-25 2017-05-02 Acushnet Company Golf club head with depression
US8267808B2 (en) * 2006-10-25 2012-09-18 Acushnet Company Golf club with optimum moments of inertia in the vertical and hosel axes
US20090149276A1 (en) * 2007-12-07 2009-06-11 Golden Charles E Metal Wood Club with Improved Moment of Inertia
US9192831B2 (en) 2009-01-20 2015-11-24 Nike, Inc. Golf club and golf club head structures
US9795845B2 (en) 2009-01-20 2017-10-24 Karsten Manufacturing Corporation Golf club and golf club head structures
US9149693B2 (en) 2009-01-20 2015-10-06 Nike, Inc. Golf club and golf club head structures
WO2011011699A1 (en) 2009-07-24 2011-01-27 Nike International, Ltd. Golf club head or other ball striking device having impact-influence body features
US8784234B2 (en) 2010-07-27 2014-07-22 Sri Sports Limited Golf club head with a body-conforming weight member
US9687705B2 (en) 2010-11-30 2017-06-27 Nike, Inc. Golf club head or other ball striking device having impact-influencing body features
JP5715520B2 (en) * 2011-07-28 2015-05-07 ダンロップスポーツ株式会社 Golf club head and evaluation method thereof
US8758167B2 (en) * 2011-09-15 2014-06-24 Acushnet Company Compositions for golf balls based on oriented nanostructures
US9072948B2 (en) 2011-11-30 2015-07-07 Nike, Inc. Golf club head or other ball striking device utilizing energy transfer
US10357693B2 (en) * 2011-11-30 2019-07-23 Nike, Inc. Golf clubs and golf club heads
US9855477B2 (en) 2011-11-30 2018-01-02 Nike, Inc. Golf clubs and golf club heads
US9943733B2 (en) 2011-11-30 2018-04-17 Nike, Inc. Golf clubs and golf club heads
US9956463B2 (en) 2011-11-30 2018-05-01 Nike, Inc. Golf clubs and golf club heads
US9873028B2 (en) * 2011-11-30 2018-01-23 Nike, Inc. Golf clubs and golf club heads
US11027178B2 (en) 2018-12-13 2021-06-08 Acushnet Company Golf club head with improved inertia performance
US11213730B2 (en) 2018-12-13 2022-01-04 Acushnet Company Golf club head with improved inertia performance
US9101811B1 (en) * 2012-06-08 2015-08-11 Callaway Golf Company CG height adjustability by conformal weighting
US10610745B2 (en) 2013-03-14 2020-04-07 Karsten Manufacturing Corporation Golf club heads with optimized characteristics and related methods
CN106994229B (en) 2013-03-14 2019-03-12 卡斯腾制造公司 Glof club head and correlation technique with optimization characteristics
US10434381B2 (en) 2013-03-14 2019-10-08 Karsten Manufacturing Corporation Club head having balanced impact and swing performance characteristics
US9186561B2 (en) 2013-03-14 2015-11-17 Karsten Manufacturing Corporation Golf club heads with optimized characteristics and related methods
US10080933B2 (en) 2013-03-14 2018-09-25 Karsten Manufacturing Corporation Golf club heads with optimized characteristics and related methods
US9144722B2 (en) 2013-03-14 2015-09-29 Karsten Manufacturing Corporation Golf club heads with optimized characteristics and related methods
US10046211B2 (en) 2014-05-29 2018-08-14 Nike, Inc. Golf clubs and golf club heads
US9914026B2 (en) 2014-06-20 2018-03-13 Karsten Manufacturing Corporation Golf club head or other ball striking device having impact-influencing body features
US10245474B2 (en) 2014-06-20 2019-04-02 Karsten Manufacturing Corporation Golf club head or other ball striking device having impact-influencing body features
US9744412B2 (en) 2014-06-20 2017-08-29 Karsten Manufacturing Corporation Golf club head or other ball striking device having impact-influencing body features
US9526956B2 (en) 2014-09-05 2016-12-27 Acushnet Company Golf club head
US9925428B2 (en) 2015-05-29 2018-03-27 Karsten Manufacturing Corporation Golf club head or other ball striking device having impact-influencing body features
US11517799B2 (en) * 2017-12-08 2022-12-06 Karsten Manufacturing Corporation Multi-component golf club head
US11819743B2 (en) 2016-05-27 2023-11-21 Karsten Manufacturing Corporation Mixed material golf club head
US10940373B2 (en) 2016-05-27 2021-03-09 Karsten Manufacturing Corporation Mixed material golf club head
KR102619785B1 (en) 2016-05-27 2024-01-02 카스턴 매뉴팩츄어링 코오포레이숀 Mixed material golf club head
US10940374B2 (en) 2016-05-27 2021-03-09 Karsten Manufacturing Corporation Mixed material golf club head
KR102443374B1 (en) 2016-11-18 2022-09-14 카스턴 매뉴팩츄어링 코오포레이숀 Club head having balanced impact and swing performance characteristics
GB2604456B (en) 2018-01-19 2023-03-01 Karsten Mfg Corp Golf club heads comprising a thermoplastic composite material
US10675514B2 (en) 2018-01-19 2020-06-09 Karsten Manufacturing Corporation Mixed material golf club head
US11497970B2 (en) 2018-12-13 2022-11-15 Acushnet Company Golf club head with improved inertia performance and removable aft body coupled by snap fit connection
US11192005B2 (en) 2018-12-13 2021-12-07 Acushnet Company Golf club head with improved inertia performance
US11331546B2 (en) 2018-12-13 2022-05-17 Acushnet Company Golf club head with improved inertia performance
US11446555B2 (en) 2018-12-13 2022-09-20 Acushnet Company Golf club head with improved inertia performance and removable aft body coupled by metal-composite joint
US10967232B2 (en) 2019-05-15 2021-04-06 Karsten Manufacturing Corporation Club head having balanced impact and swing performance characteristics
JP7423987B2 (en) * 2019-11-07 2024-01-30 住友ゴム工業株式会社 golf club head
US11679313B2 (en) 2021-09-24 2023-06-20 Acushnet Company Golf club head

Citations (15)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4420156A (en) * 1982-03-22 1983-12-13 Pepsico, Inc. Iron-type golf clubs
US4471961A (en) * 1982-09-15 1984-09-18 Pepsico, Inc. Golf club with bulge radius and increased moment of inertia about an inclined axis
US5094457A (en) * 1991-05-24 1992-03-10 Frank Kinoshita Low axial inertia golf club
US5681228A (en) * 1995-11-16 1997-10-28 Bridgestone Sports Co., Ltd. Golf club head
US6425832B2 (en) * 1997-10-23 2002-07-30 Callaway Golf Company Golf club head that optimizes products of inertia
US6491592B2 (en) * 1999-11-01 2002-12-10 Callaway Golf Company Multiple material golf club head
US6558272B2 (en) * 2000-06-28 2003-05-06 Callaway Golf Company Golf club striking plate with variable bulge and roll
US6607452B2 (en) * 1997-10-23 2003-08-19 Callaway Golf Company High moment of inertia composite golf club head
US6679782B2 (en) * 1999-09-03 2004-01-20 Callaway Golf Company Putter head
US6716110B1 (en) * 2003-05-27 2004-04-06 Paul Ballow Golf putter
US6991558B2 (en) * 2001-03-29 2006-01-31 Taylor Made Golf Co., Lnc. Golf club head
US20060148586A1 (en) * 2005-01-03 2006-07-06 Callaway Golf Company Golf Club Head
US7163470B2 (en) * 2004-06-25 2007-01-16 Callaway Golf Company Golf club head
US7410428B1 (en) * 2007-03-09 2008-08-12 Callaway Golf Company Golf club head with high moment of inertia
US7497789B2 (en) * 2006-10-25 2009-03-03 Acushnet Company Metal wood club with improved moment of inertia

Family Cites Families (43)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US687540A (en) * 1900-05-11 1901-11-26 Isaac E Palmer Golf-club.
US1222770A (en) * 1916-09-02 1917-04-17 Benjamin M Kaye Golf-club.
US1867103A (en) * 1927-11-23 1932-07-12 Schavolite Golf Corp Golf club head and process of making the same
US1841062A (en) * 1928-08-15 1932-01-12 Schavolite Golf Corp Golf club head and process of making the same
US1983158A (en) * 1931-12-31 1934-12-04 Leonard A Young Head and shaft assembly for golf clubs
US3519271A (en) * 1967-05-10 1970-07-07 Kenneth Smith Shaft and club head attaching means
US3980301A (en) * 1975-06-26 1976-09-14 Smith Kenneth L Wood golf club improvement
JPH0344215Y2 (en) * 1985-04-01 1991-09-17
US4927144A (en) * 1989-08-07 1990-05-22 Stormon Robert D Putter
US5197733A (en) * 1990-12-24 1993-03-30 Schroder Edward W Golf club
US5377978A (en) 1994-07-05 1995-01-03 Lee; Michael C. W. Golf club hosel shift
US5435551A (en) * 1994-11-22 1995-07-25 Chen; Archer C. C. Golf club head of composite material
JPH08289943A (en) * 1995-02-21 1996-11-05 Gi Keifuku Golf club
US6050903A (en) * 1996-03-11 2000-04-18 Lake; Connie Golf club with improved coupling between head and shaft
US5722901A (en) * 1997-02-11 1998-03-03 Barron; John R. Releasable fastening structure for trial golf club shafts and heads
US5851160A (en) 1997-04-09 1998-12-22 Taylor Made Golf Company, Inc. Metalwood golf club head
JP3161519B2 (en) * 1997-12-26 2001-04-25 株式会社遠藤製作所 Golf club and its set
US6634958B1 (en) * 1998-01-22 2003-10-21 Daiwa Seiko, Inc. Golf club
US6001028A (en) * 1998-02-11 1999-12-14 Tang; Huei-Hsien Double-balanced golf club head
CA2246965C (en) * 1998-09-15 2001-08-28 Leung Tom Self-aligning, minimal self-torque golf clubs
JP2000210398A (en) * 1999-01-22 2000-08-02 Daiwa Seiko Inc Golf club
JP4260968B2 (en) 1999-03-18 2009-04-30 ブリヂストンスポーツ株式会社 Wood club head
US6575845B2 (en) 1999-11-01 2003-06-10 Callaway Golf Company Multiple material golf club head
US6582323B2 (en) 1999-11-01 2003-06-24 Callaway Golf Company Multiple material golf club head
US6565452B2 (en) 1999-11-01 2003-05-20 Callaway Golf Company Multiple material golf club head with face insert
TW577761B (en) * 1999-11-01 2004-03-01 Callaway Golf Co Multiple material golf club head
US6299546B1 (en) * 1999-12-21 2001-10-09 Chih-Hung Wang Club head assembly for a golf club
US6602149B1 (en) 2002-03-25 2003-08-05 Callaway Golf Company Bonded joint design for a golf club head
US6648773B1 (en) 2002-07-12 2003-11-18 Callaway Golf Company Golf club head with metal striking plate insert
US7186190B1 (en) * 2002-11-08 2007-03-06 Taylor Made Golf Company, Inc. Golf club head having movable weights
US7147572B2 (en) 2002-11-28 2006-12-12 Sri Sports Limited Wood type golf club head
JP4423435B2 (en) 2002-12-19 2010-03-03 Sriスポーツ株式会社 Golf club head
US7025692B2 (en) * 2004-02-05 2006-04-11 Callaway Golf Company Multiple material golf club head
US6939247B1 (en) * 2004-03-29 2005-09-06 Karsten Manufacturing Corporation Golf club head with high center of gravity
US6964617B2 (en) * 2004-04-19 2005-11-15 Callaway Golf Company Golf club head with gasket
US7059973B2 (en) * 2004-09-10 2006-06-13 Callaway Golf Company Multiple material golf club head
US7163468B2 (en) * 2005-01-03 2007-01-16 Callaway Golf Company Golf club head
US7803065B2 (en) * 2005-04-21 2010-09-28 Cobra Golf, Inc. Golf club head
US7722477B2 (en) * 2005-12-08 2010-05-25 Joseph Consiglio Impact force dampening system for use with a golf driver or fairway club head
US20070281796A1 (en) * 2006-05-31 2007-12-06 Gilbert Peter J Muscle-back iron golf clubs with higher moment of intertia and lower center of gravity
US8025591B2 (en) * 2006-10-25 2011-09-27 Acushnet Company Golf club with optimum moments of inertia in the vertical and hosel axes
US8267808B2 (en) * 2006-10-25 2012-09-18 Acushnet Company Golf club with optimum moments of inertia in the vertical and hosel axes
US8012038B1 (en) * 2008-12-11 2011-09-06 Taylor Made Golf Company, Inc. Golf club head

Patent Citations (16)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4420156A (en) * 1982-03-22 1983-12-13 Pepsico, Inc. Iron-type golf clubs
US4471961A (en) * 1982-09-15 1984-09-18 Pepsico, Inc. Golf club with bulge radius and increased moment of inertia about an inclined axis
US5094457A (en) * 1991-05-24 1992-03-10 Frank Kinoshita Low axial inertia golf club
US5681228A (en) * 1995-11-16 1997-10-28 Bridgestone Sports Co., Ltd. Golf club head
US6607452B2 (en) * 1997-10-23 2003-08-19 Callaway Golf Company High moment of inertia composite golf club head
US6425832B2 (en) * 1997-10-23 2002-07-30 Callaway Golf Company Golf club head that optimizes products of inertia
US6679782B2 (en) * 1999-09-03 2004-01-20 Callaway Golf Company Putter head
US6491592B2 (en) * 1999-11-01 2002-12-10 Callaway Golf Company Multiple material golf club head
US6558272B2 (en) * 2000-06-28 2003-05-06 Callaway Golf Company Golf club striking plate with variable bulge and roll
US6991558B2 (en) * 2001-03-29 2006-01-31 Taylor Made Golf Co., Lnc. Golf club head
US7198575B2 (en) * 2001-03-29 2007-04-03 Taylor Made Golf Co. Golf club head
US6716110B1 (en) * 2003-05-27 2004-04-06 Paul Ballow Golf putter
US7163470B2 (en) * 2004-06-25 2007-01-16 Callaway Golf Company Golf club head
US20060148586A1 (en) * 2005-01-03 2006-07-06 Callaway Golf Company Golf Club Head
US7497789B2 (en) * 2006-10-25 2009-03-03 Acushnet Company Metal wood club with improved moment of inertia
US7410428B1 (en) * 2007-03-09 2008-08-12 Callaway Golf Company Golf club head with high moment of inertia

Cited By (15)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US8241139B2 (en) 2010-02-24 2012-08-14 Sri Sports Limited Golf club
US8784231B2 (en) 2010-02-24 2014-07-22 Sri Sports Limited Golf club
US8951142B2 (en) 2010-02-24 2015-02-10 Sri Sports Limited Golf club
US20100273567A1 (en) * 2010-02-24 2010-10-28 Sri Sports Limited Golf club
US20220258016A1 (en) * 2013-03-14 2022-08-18 Karsten Manufacturing Corporation Golf club heads with optimized characteristics and related methods
US11819746B2 (en) * 2013-03-14 2023-11-21 Karsten Manufacturing Corporation Golf club heads with optimized characteristics and related methods
US20170136316A1 (en) * 2015-11-18 2017-05-18 Acushnet Company Multi-material golf club head
US20180111027A1 (en) * 2015-11-18 2018-04-26 Acushnet Company Multi-material golf club head
US10232230B2 (en) * 2015-11-18 2019-03-19 Acushnet Company Multi-material golf club head
US10569143B2 (en) * 2015-11-18 2020-02-25 Acushnet Company Multi-material golf club head
US20190046845A1 (en) * 2017-08-10 2019-02-14 Taylor Made Golf Company, Inc. Golf club heads
US10881917B2 (en) 2017-08-10 2021-01-05 Taylor Made Golf Company, Inc. Golf club heads
US11701557B2 (en) * 2017-08-10 2023-07-18 Taylor Made Golf Company, Inc. Golf club heads
US20230310954A1 (en) * 2017-08-10 2023-10-05 Taylor Made Golf Company, Inc. Golf club heads
US10874915B2 (en) * 2017-08-10 2020-12-29 Taylor Made Golf Company, Inc. Golf club heads

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US20130102414A1 (en) 2013-04-25
US20120058839A1 (en) 2012-03-08
US20140128178A1 (en) 2014-05-08
US8636608B2 (en) 2014-01-28
US8333668B2 (en) 2012-12-18
US9302161B2 (en) 2016-04-05
US8267808B2 (en) 2012-09-18

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US9302161B2 (en) Golf club with optimum moments of inertia in the vertical and hosel axis
US8025591B2 (en) Golf club with optimum moments of inertia in the vertical and hosel axes
US11819745B2 (en) High loft, low center-of-gravity golf club heads
US7862451B2 (en) Golf club head with integrally attached weight members
EP2536473B1 (en) Golf club or golf club head having an adjustable ball striking face
US9474946B2 (en) Metal wood club with improved moment of inertia
US8608585B2 (en) Golf club head or other ball striking device having a reinforced or localized stiffened face portion
US8608591B2 (en) Golf club head
US7198575B2 (en) Golf club head
US20120004048A1 (en) Golf club with optimum moments of inertia in the vertical and hosel axes

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: ACUSHNET COMPANY, MASSACHUSETTS

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:DE LA CRUZ, NOAH;GOLDEN, CHARLES E.;MORIN, JOHN;REEL/FRAME:023002/0035;SIGNING DATES FROM 20090722 TO 20090723

Owner name: ACUSHNET COMPANY, MASSACHUSETTS

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:DE LA CRUZ, NOAH;GOLDEN, CHARLES E.;MORIN, JOHN;SIGNING DATES FROM 20090722 TO 20090723;REEL/FRAME:023002/0035

STCF Information on status: patent grant

Free format text: PATENTED CASE

FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 4

AS Assignment

Owner name: WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT, CALIFORNIA

Free format text: SECURITY INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:ACUSHNET COMPANY;REEL/FRAME:039506/0030

Effective date: 20160728

Owner name: WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS ADMINIS

Free format text: SECURITY INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:ACUSHNET COMPANY;REEL/FRAME:039506/0030

Effective date: 20160728

MAFP Maintenance fee payment

Free format text: PAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEE, 8TH YEAR, LARGE ENTITY (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: M1552); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY

Year of fee payment: 8

AS Assignment

Owner name: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS SUCCESSOR ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT, ILLINOIS

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF SECURITY INTEREST IN PATENTS (ASSIGNS 039506-0030);ASSIGNOR:WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, AS RESIGNING ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT;REEL/FRAME:061521/0414

Effective date: 20220802

Owner name: JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., AS ADMINISTRATIVE AGENT, ILLINOIS

Free format text: SECURITY INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:ACUSHNET COMPANY;REEL/FRAME:061099/0236

Effective date: 20220802